The paragraph of caveats of every type--environmental, ethical, erroneous--caused me to think "Say no more!"
I understand your statement later that you think users should be involved to help guide AI in a better direction. Users do not carry the weight of the systems' algorithms. I seems to me that users are being MISguided rather than guided to the outcomes they seek.
I hear promises of greater efficiency, but I then read that you are having to coax the kind of information you want from your chosen AI platform.
I hope you are are traversing this terrain with guardedness and caution.
My alarm bells are certainly ringing. I also am surprised how different the opinions and approaches are of various thought leaders I follow--some have disavowed AI entirely, some have jumped right in, and some are somewhere in between.
The paragraph of caveats of every type--environmental, ethical, erroneous--caused me to think "Say no more!"
I understand your statement later that you think users should be involved to help guide AI in a better direction. Users do not carry the weight of the systems' algorithms. I seems to me that users are being MISguided rather than guided to the outcomes they seek.
I hear promises of greater efficiency, but I then read that you are having to coax the kind of information you want from your chosen AI platform.
I hope you are are traversing this terrain with guardedness and caution.
My alarm bells are certainly ringing. I also am surprised how different the opinions and approaches are of various thought leaders I follow--some have disavowed AI entirely, some have jumped right in, and some are somewhere in between.